Legal identity
Registered company name, address, trade-registry information and available official-record consistency.
Supplier verification
Supplier verification turns broad claims into specific checks, identifies inconsistencies and shows which gaps deserve deeper technical, legal or on-site review.
Request supplier reviewDirect answer
Verify the legal entity and payment beneficiary, establish the relationship to the claimed factory, test capability against the exact product, validate relevant documents, and reconcile the quotation with the supplier identity. Then escalate to independent audit, testing or inspection when remote evidence cannot cover the downside.
Registered company name, address, trade-registry information and available official-record consistency.
Signals that distinguish an actual manufacturer from a trader, broker, brand or unrelated legal entity.
Production claims, equipment, material, process, capacity and experience assessed against your actual requirement.
Certificates and supporting documents reviewed for issuer, scope, dates, entity and product relevance.
Beneficiary, quotation, payment terms, Incoterm, lead time and company identity checked for contradictions.
Clear recommendations for independent audit, testing, legal review or inspection when remote evidence is not enough.
Verification depth
A low-value sample and a tooling-heavy production order should not receive the same due-diligence scope.
Reconcile the contracting entity, factory claim, contact details, quotation and requested payment route.
Decision output: Identity matches, exceptions are explained, or payment is paused.
Review process, equipment, materials, capacity, samples and experience relevant to the exact requirement.
Decision output: Capability appears supported, limited, or requires on-site confirmation.
Assess issuer, holder, site, product scope, dates and destination-market relevance.
Decision output: Usable evidence, expired or irrelevant evidence, and missing items are separated.
Add audit, testing, inspection, legal or customs specialists where the remaining uncertainty is material.
Decision output: A proportionate control plan before the next payment or approval gate.
| Decision factor | Buyer question | Evidence to review |
|---|---|---|
| Entity | Who signs, invoices and receives payment? | Registration records, address, tax or trade data, bank-beneficiary consistency and authorized contacts. |
| Factory | Who physically makes the product? | Site evidence, process flow, equipment, workforce, production records and disclosed subcontractors. |
| Capability | Can the operation meet this specification repeatedly? | Technical review, comparable output, sample plan, tolerances, capacity and quality controls. |
| Documents | Are the claims current and relevant? | Issuer verification, holder, scope, validity, product or site match and destination requirement. |
| Transaction | Does the proposed deal remain internally consistent? | Quotation, contract, Incoterm, payment milestones, lead time, beneficiary and change-control terms. |
Common questions
It establishes what available evidence supports about identity, factory relationship, capability, documents and commercial consistency. It does not guarantee future production or delivery.
On-site audit, independent testing or legal review is appropriate when tooling, large deposits, regulated products, unclear subcontracting or difficult-to-inspect quality create material exposure.
No. Check the issuer, holder, scope, product or site relevance, dates and whether the destination market actually requires that evidence.
Free first step
Share the product and your work email. We will review your international buyer brief and whether Türkiye is a realistic fit before asking you to commit to a supplier.